Saturday, April 14, 2007

The Oregonian Pontificates About Don Imus

The Oregonian has jumped on the Imus-bashing band wagon, and it's the safe thing to do. Yes, this is the appropriate move by the corporate media, and the Oregonian's analysis of the depths to which radio has sunk under the shock jocks, is all standard stuff.

I just wonder if the Oregonian editors can hold that all-knowing mirror up and look at themselves? Maybe they should ask themselves about the depths newspapers have sunk to as well. Who has let America down more? Imus and his ilk on the radio, or the 4th Estate?

Before they answer, they should remember that when this country was heading into a war in Iraq, the newspapers went along on a government-directed marketing campaign. Imus didn't take that ride. If Imus led American culture "to a lot of places that would have been better left unexplored", he also explored the case for war when the newspapers refused to look. Wasn't this something that should have been examined more vigorously by our sanctimonious, government servants working in mainstream media?

Don Imus and his producer Bernard McGuirk were the most visible challengers to the War in Iraq before it started, while the newspapers were engaged in copying and pasting the GOP talking points. The exceptions in newspapers were few. For example, I wrote a couple of columns in the Portland Tribune questioning the wisdom of the plan just prior to the invasion, and I was told that led to my dismissal.

Back then there wasn't anyone besides Imus as high up in the mainstream media, who was willing to question the Iraq War. Up till last week, he was the most visible person on television who regularly referred to Dick Cheney as a war criminal. Not to mention the only one. Meanwhile, our newspapers continue to play it safe, through the most dangerously inept administration in American History. How will they be judged on that?

Yes, the newspapers did some stories on Walter Reed, but Imus wasn't letting the story go. He challenged the senators who came on his show the way the 4th Estate used to, before it was purchased by corporate giants and muzzled. So go ahead and unload on his cruel humor. It's always easy to kick someone when they're down, and the racist stuff is indefensible.

Just don't forget to shine that mirror on yourselves. When American culture needed the media to examine the Bush administration, you people were absent, and you still are. Imus was on the case. Imus was angry and outraged while the newspaper editors have been way too complacent and polite. It's like they're stuck in another century.

The editorial about Imus finishes sarcastically that it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Well, maybe the editors of our newspapers should stop being so nice - nice to the powers that be. I'd prefer a little less nice when it comes to issues in this town, as well as with the nightmares facing our nation.

When the historians write about these years, there may be mention of the negative effect of shock jocks on American culture, but the more damning assessment will be the effect of not having a 4th Estate that did its job. If newspapers were more interested in being an independent voice for the People, maybe so many of us wouldn't have turned to Don Imus to try and get a sense of the real news. The Internet gets blamed, but newspapers are also sliding because they haven't been performing their role in a healthy democracy - which is why our democracy is in some trouble right now. The ironic thing is that the newspapers are acting this way, even though they're paying for not doing their jobs. So go ahead and belittle Imus. If the circulation numbers are true, newspaper people are being chased out of their jobs just as surely as Don Imus was - it's just in slow motion.

Radio might have too much shock, but newspapers don't have enough. They're too content to go along. Sure, Imus was straddling some tricky demographics, but he rarely just went along. He didn't duck the issues or create fake ones to have something to report. He was grouchy and cantankerous, but anybody who can report on these times, and not be in a similar mood, is in denial, paid off, or crazy.

Oh, and one other thing: Imus might have had diminished clout according to the Oregonian, but he was able to raise the death benefits for a soldier killed in the war - a war that newspapers helped market - from $12,000 to $100,000 for the spouse and $400,000 for the children. He had enough clout left to do that.

Yes, Imus wasn't nice. Just ask Dick Cheney. Imus was a little too real, but newspapers such as the Oregonian are a little too phony. It's easy to lament the role of shock jocks in our society, and get all morally outraged about what's happened to radio, but the bigger tragedy is what's happened to newspapers. These Oregonian editors should hold that same mirror up and look at themselves.
In the end, the shock was his

4 Comments:

At 5:00 PM, Anonymous Tenskwatawa said...

All the degeneracies and civic damages that The zerO finds in Imus, are displayed every day to see in LIARS Larson.

The zerO puts itself in the same degenerate incivility when, in keeping going dumb and silent, it does not stand up against LIARS.

 
At 5:15 PM, Anonymous butch said...

Tensawhata, educate me here. I'm no fan of Lars, but can you point to any specific examples of his "every day" transgressions? Or are just name calling because you disagree with him ideologically?

 
At 10:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

just to switch topics...when will the 'surge' be called what it is...a troop build up...?
buying the terminology begs the question and give an undertone of legitimacy that otherwise would not be there were the military action called a 'troop build up".

 
At 6:31 PM, Anonymous Tenskwatawa said...

Gwen Ifill Calls Out Russert, Brooks For Their Silence On Imus, and exactly so the The zerO, for its awful silence. Anyone who works at the newspaper should be ashamed -- to admit it, to face their friends, to cash their paycheck and feed their family with where that badblood ad money comes from.

Friggin' liar LIARS rips the social fabric for years, here, and the paper slowly bleeds pale, ashen, and ghostly gone-to-nothing, losing supporters and subscribers disgusted with them sitting silent and so consenting, that verbal violence, outright criminality, and mean-streets puke-in-your-face politics perverted absolutely is fine by them.

What can The zerO do? How about this: Refuse service to wannabe customers trying to buy newspaper ad space, when those same (business) customers have bought LIARS ad time, and paid support of fascist foaming broadcast programming, eh?

Play business ad-dollar against business ad-dollar, and end the newspaper's equinimical 'legitimizing' appearance for fascist-funding businesses.

This morning on NBC’s Meet the Press, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill directly called out host Tim Russert and fellow guest David Brooks for FAILING TO SPEAK OUT against Don Imus’ offensive remarks.

“There has been radio silence from a lot of people who have done this program who could have spoken up and said, I find this offensive or I didn’t know,” Ifill said. “These people didn’t speak up.” She then turned Russert and Brooks, frequest guests on Imus’s show. “Tim, we didn’t hear from you. David, we didn’t hear from you.

The Oregonian, we did NOT hear from you.

Ifill added, “A lot of people did know and a lot of people were listening and they just decided it was okay. They decided this culture of meanness was fine, until ...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home