Phil Stanford and the Million Dollar Column
Phil Stanford’s column today - “Bitter end is near for political machine” - is a masterpiece. This is when I want to hear from the critics; the anonymous commentators who put down Phil Stanford occasionally in the media blogs. What’s that? He writes too much about Michael Francke? He’s not hard-hitting enough? He’s playing it safe with an “aww shucks” folksiness? He doesn’t get it?
Read this column today. If Portland were a vintage car, Phil pops the hood and let’s us see the engine. Then he shows how that engine is being overhauled, even replaced by a new one right in front of us.
He poses the fundamental question of the Portland shakedown: How can we be paying this much in taxes and not have enough money to educate the children and put a police force on the street? Where does the money go?
The Goldscmidt machine, in it’s death throes, is giving way to
the “government class” – who are running their own scam with these ridiculous projects while precinct police stations close their doors.
I’ve always laughed off the anti-Phil comments in the media blogs. They seem so naïve – there’s no realization that a columnist is under a variety of conflicting pressures. A lot of the skill is in being able to drop a safe on someone without appearing to be mean. You have to vary your tone. You have to pick your moments and your fights. There’s the column you’d write if you had total freedom, and there’s the column you sometimes have to write. Then there’s days like today where that becomes the same thing.
Stanford has spent his life analyzing politics, crime, and corruption up and down the East Coast from New York through Washington, D.C. and all the way down to Miami, before moving here. Can you imagine working as a private investigator in Miami? Phil has been in some truly outrageous and dangerous scenarios, sharpening the observational skills that we benefit from in this piece.
Just read his first sentence today: “In case you haven’t noticed, there’s a huge battle going on right now for the control of the Rose City.” Do you feel yourself being drawn into that? If not, then skip the following link. I certainly read it. I’d hate to have to calculate how much an analysis like this would cost. If the city council spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on studies that go nowhere, than what would Phil’s take on the entire scene be worth to the taxpayers? I’d say a million dollars easy - more if you had to wait for someone to learn how to do it. This is decades of perception matched against 50 years of corruption, and the citizens of Portland get the win.
Bitter end is near for political machine
| PortlandTribune.com
6 Comments:
Phil nailed it.
You know, I really wondered if I'd be accused of hyperbole but when you think about how much we spend to find out about a cover for Mt. Tabor, how much is it worth to blow the cover off the city? Plus, many millions really have been spent here as Pamplin knows all too well. You've also played a role in bringing this stuff out, but Phil has been at it for decades from within a corporate structure as opposed to blog freedom. Of course, he doesn't have to deal with servers, but you get the point. It's not easy writing about the power structure from within it. I certainly never grasped the finer points.
Wonder no longer, Bill. Your portrayal of "Slick" Phil Stanford is nothing if not hyperbole. His "million dollar" column is a thinly veiled anti-tax rant, quite typical of what he writes whenever he ventures into local politics.
If you and Phil (and Jack, for that matter) truly believe that the city government is engaged in scams and shakedowns and wholesale corruption, then lay out your case in a straightforward manner. Show me some hard evidence. That would truly "blow the cover" off the city.
And speaking of corruption, correct me if I'm wrong in recalling that Phil Stanford "left" the Oregonian, not just for his Michael Francke obsession, but for falsifying a story about the police.
By the way, Bill, I loved your post on the Paul McCartney special. Nobody is a bigger Beatles fan than me.
The hihglight for me was Paul playing his Quarry Men audition song, "Twenty Flight Rock", which I've read about many times but have never actually heard.
I think the tram is a scam for starters. I think these projects are sold with one set of numbers, and goals, when the realities are quite different. I don't think it's a "vital linchpin", or designed to integrate the two halves of OHSU. I think it really just comes down to giving people on the hill someplace to park.
These affordable housing angles are spin, and these tax abatements for millionaire condos are a scandal, too. They're acting like Portland couldn't draw new people on its own, and that's just not true.
The hyperbole part applied to the million dollar figure, but when I think of what we spent studying the Mt Tabor reservoir, it may have been low.
I think this whole city-business partnership is a scam to use taxpayer dollars for a bunch of Junior Trump wheeler-dealers to play city amusement park, instead of doing the actual business of governing. How about this: Government in a partnership with the voters? Then we can transition to Government working for the voters later. Incrementally we've transformed government into the reason we exist, with the people just there to provide a revenue stream.
I think the education budget problems are a scam as well, in the sense that these leaders can't afford to have a well-educated group of young thinkers, or they'd never allow us to spend their future on crazy stunts like these.
Oh, and PGE park was a joke, too.
At least we can agree: Paul is amazing, and a credit to humanity.
Post a Comment
<< Home